![]() But a person familiar with the upcoming summit stressed the ever-changing status of the ideas under discussion: The document describing the tech alliance, for instance, has been “overtaken by events,” but wouldn’t say what that meant. Spokespeople for the White House-based National Security Council did not offer comment for this story. “There are a lot of big questions on the table that the initial gathering won’t address, like what to do about weaker democracies that are showing regression.” “The symbolism of the gathering is important, but the actual change on the ground that the summit would generate remains to be seen,” said Steven Feldstein, a senior fellow with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. That’s also true in the United States, where a polarized political environment has blocked Biden’s efforts to push through priorities such as voting rights legislation. Although none of the suggested commitments appear to be internationally binding, many will require governments to sell them to constituencies back home and allocate funding to making them real. ![]() Biden is, after all, hosting the summit during a year that has seen at least six coups in countries from Myanmar to Sudan.īut it’s far from clear how many countries attending the summit will sign up for commitments or how many will follow through. We hope the 2022 report cards will reflect significant progress – and no major backsliding.Overall, the variety of ideas underscores Biden’s view that strengthening the world’s democracies at a time of rising authoritarianism requires tools beyond mere rhetoric about free-and-fair elections. ![]() The report cards are based on 2020 baseline data and will be updated during the year of action to reflect advances over the coming year, culminating in a 2022 report at the end of the Summit process. ![]() Fortunately, the Summit for Democracy signals the start of a year of action, during which all states will have an opportunity to demonstrate progress in advancing the human rights and democratic participation of their LGBTQI citizens. Many states score poorly, especially in the second dimension on protection from violence. Only one state – Malta – has achieved all benchmarks. Countries are graded on three dimensions: Basic Rights, Protection from Violence, and Socio-economic rights. They set the collective standard for participating states’ core legal obligations and consequently the ability of LGBTQI citizens to contribute to and benefit from democratic institutions. The report cards provide a concise measurement of the attainment of core human rights protections for LGBTQI individuals. These themes of the Summit are also themes of LGBTQI movements around the world. Advancing rights for the protection of LGBTQI people is also closely correlated to broader democratic dividends, including efforts to address democratic backsliding, fight corruption, and build resilient movements to fight authoritarianism. Indeed, democracy itself cannot thrive unless the human rights of all people are protected, and this must include protections for often marginalized LGBTQI individuals. Inclusive democracies value the democratic, economic, and social contributions of all citizens. The LGBTQI Human Rights Report Cards, produced in collaboration with F&M Global Barometers, measure the extent to which countries attending the Summit protect the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI) people. Decem– The Biden Administration is hosting a Summit for Democracy this week and the Council for Global Equality scored the 110 countries that have been invited.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |